by Mary Gaylord. Reprinted from The Daily Camera.

Last week I went out with three girlfriends to enjoy some beer at a local brewpub. One woman I know quite well, the other casually, and the third woman was someone I was meeting for the first time. We all have kids — which is how we are connected — and we all live in the same small town of Superior, Colorado. As we enjoyed our finely crafted Belgian beer and pizza, the conversation ran it’s typical course — schools, kids, neighborhood goings-on, etc.

Then I decided to venture into unknown and potentially dangerous territory. I asked if anyone at the table had conservative or Republican leanings. In a soft but confident voice, one woman offered that she is conservative; a self-described “constitutionalist.” A second woman chimed in that she is of the same mind; a supporter of conservative values and constitutionally-based policies. The other person at the table — I already knew her leanings to be to the left. I outed myself as an independent (in Boulder County that is often code for liberals/progressives with a certain contempt for both major parties and a refusal to be identified formally with either.).

The conservative-leaning friends discussed their concerns about presidential candidates as well as the fact that they keep their conservative leanings quiet, knowing that Boulder County is dominated with not just left-leaners, but some very far left-leaners. We agreed that it’s a sad state of affairs when people cannot feel comfortable expressing their viewpoint without fear of being dismissed, judged, or attacked.

After the initial wave of uncertainty as to the direction this conversation might take, we relaxed into the realization that while our perspectives differ, we are also able to lean into the friendly and gracious manners we extend to people who live in our small community — challenging the notion that “one doesn’t talk about politics in polite company.” There seemed to be tacit agreement that our relationships with each other mattered more than our political differences. After all, our kids play together — what do they care when it comes to politics? Try explaining to a fourth-grader that they can’t play with their friend because their parents are voting for “fill-in-the-blank.”

I’m reminded of a song made famous by Sting, “Russians,” where Sting sings:

In Europe and America, there’s a growing feeling of hysteria

Conditioned to respond to all the threats

In the rhetorical speeches of the Soviets

Mr. Khrushchev said, “We will bury you”

I don’t subscribe to this point of view

It would be such an ignorant thing to do

If the Russians love their children too

In the current political climate, it seems we could easily replace the word “Russians” with the words “Democrats” or “Republicans” and “Mr. Khrushchev” with many of our public office hopefuls.

During the Cold War years, Americans were mostly unified against the Soviets and the threat of nuclear aggression. In the present day, it seems we are anything but unified and have defined the enemy as each other. Unified doesn’t mean we all must think the same thing or vote for the same person. It means we have differences and can still be unified as a community, supporting each other, and letting our children play together. I love my children and want a better life for them. I want a better example than what we are seeing, and, perhaps than we are demonstrating. I want my children to understand that differences need not divide us and that we are much more than simple labels. What about you? What do you want for your children, for yourself? And what are you willing to do to get there?

Mary Gaylord lives in Superior. She is a program development partner with Living Room Conversations, an organization committed to bringing together people with differences in a friendly, structured, conversational format.